Free Essays on Charles Beard

Charles Beard An Economic interpretation of the constitution of the United States. The Free Press New York 1865 The subject – The Economics that drove the way to constitution was written. Now the people there were influenced by their monetary issues of the time. And how it affected what people stood for and how they portrayed it when the constitution was written. Also how it was written to protect American Interests and property that was held by the members of the delegation. The scope – That the constitution instead of being written for the sake of liberty, lite, the pursuit of happiness, it was a work drawn up by run consolidated economics groups to protect their money, public securities, trade and shipping as well as manufacturing. These economics group stared the move for the Philadelphia convention, that wrote the original constitution . They also dominated the state convention to get the constitution ratified. It is suggested that people with a substantial property interest and agreed with the constitution but those small farmers, and debtors opposed it. Which created the crucial problem in getting it ratified. But the people who would eventually benefit from it eventually won out and gained the ratification of the constitution. The other interesting aspect of the constitution and it’s ratification was the property qualifications for voting and holding office which excluded the masses, the document was original supposed the protect. These allowed it to be ratified in the purpose to control and check the democratic majority and allow the walk and owners to maintain their ideals and also those money and trading and manufacturing assets.... Free Essays on Charles Beard Free Essays on Charles Beard Charles Beard An Economic interpretation of the constitution of the United States. The Free Press New York 1865 The subject – The Economics that drove the way to constitution was written. Now the people there were influenced by their monetary issues of the time. And how it affected what people stood for and how they portrayed it when the constitution was written. Also how it was written to protect American Interests and property that was held by the members of the delegation. The scope – That the constitution instead of being written for the sake of liberty, lite, the pursuit of happiness, it was a work drawn up by run consolidated economics groups to protect their money, public securities, trade and shipping as well as manufacturing. These economics group stared the move for the Philadelphia convention, that wrote the original constitution . They also dominated the state convention to get the constitution ratified. It is suggested that people with a substantial property interest and agreed with the constitution but those small farmers, and debtors opposed it. Which created the crucial problem in getting it ratified. But the people who would eventually benefit from it eventually won out and gained the ratification of the constitution. The other interesting aspect of the constitution and it’s ratification was the property qualifications for voting and holding office which excluded the masses, the document was original supposed the protect. These allowed it to be ratified in the purpose to control and check the democratic majority and allow the walk and owners to maintain their ideals and also those money and trading and manufacturing assets....

Albert Durer essays

Albert Durer essays Albert Durer was a very great artist. Some people consider him one of the best artists in the Renaissance period, or the best artist of the renaissance period in Germany. He only left Nuremberg three times to visit Venice and the Netherlands. Albrecht Durer was born in Nurembourg in May 21, 1471. His father, Albrecht Durer was a goldsmith, he had come from Germany to Nurembourg in 1455 and married Barbara Holper. Barbara's father was Albrecht's master. Albrecht was his father's third son. He was apprenticed by Michael Wolgumut in 1486 and began to work with woodcuts. He finished his apprentiship with Michael Wolgumut after four years. Than, in 1494, he married Agnes Frey and left Nuremberg to go to Venice the same year. He became very fascinated by their style and worked on woodcuts, drawings, paintings, wood and copper engravings. From that period on, the Italian influence was unmistakable in his work. Since paintings were very costly and not many people could afford them. Durer decided to work on woodcuts so that he could easily create copies of his work. These copies were used to educate people in religious and classical history. In 1507 Durer made another trip to Venice; he stayed there for a year and a half. After he returned, he seemed to have given up painting, and instead spent most of his time to his copper and wood engravings. In 1513 and 1514 he completed his three best-known copper engravings: 'Knight, Death and Devil', 'St. Jerome in His Study', and 'Melancholia'. Durer also researched about the mathematics of proportion and perspective and published two works on this topic during his life. He was a friend of Martin Luther and several other leaders of the Reformation. He died in Nuremberg on April 6, 1528. ...

See the pix Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 1

See the pix - Essay Example Among the two leaders, Saito used forceful tactics over Colonel Nicholson. In management studies, there are autocratic leaders who often think that they can get their orders through with force (Gardener, 2003). This is exactly the tactics that Saito employed over Nicholson when he slapped Nicholson with a copy of the Geneva Convention that Nicholson was criticizing him with. On the part of Nicholson, his tactics was that of logical intuition whereby he played on the logical reasoning of Saito when he refused release from the oven by Clipton. The individual influence tactics used by the two leaders on their dependants was not different from what they used against themselves. Saito in all means stamped his authority through force whiles Nicholson was more gentle and logical with his dependants. An evidence of this was when Nicholson agreed to the building of the bridge on what could be described as a humanitarian grounds than on a leadership grounds. It is not surprising therefore that Nicholson had a simple aim of completing the bridge as an example of the ingenuity and hard work of his Army. As for Saito, all he was seeking to avoid was the looming seppuku. On a personal ground, Saito wanted to avoid seppuku and on organizational grounds, he wanted to show his supremacy over his people. On the part of Colonel Nicholson, his personal goal was to exemplify the unique gift of creativity and hard work with which the British Army worked. This goal was set despite the fact that he was indeed working to favor the Japanese more than the British. On an organizational ground, his goal was to ensure evenness and allow the full rigors of the law to operate. In leadership and management studies, leaders’ behaviors are influenced by the goals and vice versa. Leaders who want to be autocratic often have a hardened behavior that gives little room for other people to express themselves. Clearly, the evidence of this was seen in the